I am seeing lenders and loan sale advisors doing something today that astounds me and that I feel will not only have negative ramifications for both the lenders and advisors involved but for the entire loan sale industry. That something is the “advertising” of loans for sale via the Internet and showing the loan description, the collateral photograph and the collateral address without first obtaining a confidentiality agreement from the prospective buyers.
I have had many conversations with lender’s attorneys over the past twenty years as a loan sale advisor regarding the securities aspect of loan sales. The majority, but not vast majority, of those conversations resulted in the attorney acquiescing and stating that although they considered whole loans a “security” that there was no clear cut regulation prohibiting a loan sale and that there was no licensing body, such as the NASD, or now FINRA, regulating the sale and marketing of whole loans. Other considerations that affected positive decisions to agree to a loan sale were the fact that potential buyers were to be Accredited Investors; the loan would not be advertised for sale; that strict Confidentiality Agreements would be adhered to by both advisors and prospective buyers; and the significance that many peer lenders have been successfully conducting loan sales for many years without issue.
Then in 1999 the passage of the Gramm Leach Bliley Act (GLBA) and in 2000 the adoption of GLBA by the SEC in the formation of Regulation S-P again muddied the water as to “what confidential information is allowed to be shared by financial institutions and with whom.” There appears to be a consensus that Reg. P as it is known is limited to “consumer” loans and does not apply to loans for “commercial” purposes. However loan documents between borrowers and lenders can create many exceptions to these laws and regulations. For a current insight into what these issues could be as it relates to loan sale I recommended reading a very clear and concise article by the McGuire Woods Law Firm at:
http://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/article.asp?articleid=121576
There is no argument that loan sale laypersons and seasoned professionals alike can become confused by what information is considered “allowed” to be shared with non financial institutions with or without a Confidentiality Agreement. So let me try to quell the confusion here by simply stating what I see to be obvious:
All loan sale Confidentiality Agreements that I have ever received from a lender (I’m sure it’s well over 1,000 in 20 years) or have recently reviewed on the Internet sites advertising loan sales and that identify specific loans, collateral and collateral addresses contain a provision that specifically “prohibits” contact of the borrower or borrower's representative by the reviewer for “any” reason.
Understood, however that applies only to those who have “signed” the agreement. Every loan buyer and real estate professional knows how to locate the name of the owner of a property when they know just the location not to mention the specific address. By knowing the name of the property owner it’s very easy to look up the lien recording information thereby having the name of both the borrower and the lender.
This being the case poses the question: “How do you police “non-registrants” from contacting the borrower?”
Answer: “You cannot.”
Experience tells me that “bad” things can happen when a borrower is notified of an upcoming loan sale. Experience also tells me that “worse” things can happen when potential buyers contact those borrowers. I have not personally witnessed what happens when those same borrowers obtain legal counsel and file lender liability claims for breach of confidentiality but I have heard firsthand accounts of the results and they ain’t pretty.
I’ve said it before lenders, you know better; advisors you should know better. It does not take a fortune teller, psychic or a sage to see the future if this practice continues. To quote the movie "There will be blood."



Recent Comments